{"version":"1.0.0-rc1","updated_at":"2026-07-10","public":true,"gated":false,"checkout_enabled":true,"products_purchasable":true,"agent_pay_status":"live","products_x402_enabled":90,"products_x402_disabled":0,"vault_x402_enabled":true,"what_you_buy":"A structured set of plain-text Markdown and JSON files you download and keep. You use them with your own AI tools (Claude, ChatGPT, MCP-based agents, or any LLM assistant) or entirely manually. This is a document system - not software, not an app, not a plugin, not a hosted service.","not_included":["No software, app, executable, or code that runs by itself","No hosted service, account, login, or cloud dashboard","No live integrations: Zapier/Make items are written blueprint descriptions, not built Zaps or scenarios","No API access, API keys, credentials, or third-party subscriptions","No custom setup, done-for-you implementation, or human consulting hours","No AI model access - you bring your own Claude/ChatGPT/LLM subscription or local model","No payment processing of any kind inside the products","No guaranteed business results: no sales, income, traffic, ranking, or performance promises - outcomes depend on your execution and market"],"compatibility_reality":"Names in compatible_systems mean the files WORK WITH those tools - you can paste, attach, or reference them there. It does not mean prebuilt integrations: nothing auto-installs into Claude, ChatGPT, Zapier, Make, Notion, or GitHub.","update_scope":"A one-time purchase includes the product version bought plus fixes to that version. SignalHarness Vault monthly or annual recurring access provides the current Vault catalog while the subscription remains active.","ask_before_buying":["Am I comfortable working in plain-text Markdown/JSON files?","Do I have my own AI assistant access (Claude, ChatGPT, or similar) or am I happy to use the manual paths?","Do I have 1-2 hours to implement, not just read?","Have I read the included/not-included lists for this exact product?","Do I understand this is a document system, not software or a service?"],"contact_before_refund":"Email support@signalharness.ai before requesting a refund. Delivery failures, corrupted files, wrong-tier purchases, and most fit confusion are fixable - usually within one business day. Refund requests remain available under the 14-day policy either way.","full":"/agent/buyer-fit.json","products":{"agent-context-engineering-os":{"kind":"document operating system (methods, budgets, policies, audits)","fit":["Engineers and operators running long-horizon or RAG-backed agents","Teams whose agents degrade as context grows","Orchestrator agents applying written context policy"],"not":["Buyers expecting software that manages context automatically","Casual chat users without an agent stack","Anyone wanting a hosted memory service"],"flags":["name_implies_software","requires_own_agent_stack"],"ask":["Do I have an agent or RAG stack where I can apply written context policies?"]},"agent-tool-use-permission-matrix":{"kind":"policy kit (risk ladder, matrices, machine-readable contracts)","fit":["Operators giving agents access to real tools","Safety leads who need written, reviewable permission policy","Agents enforcing a documented matrix"],"not":["Buyers expecting runtime enforcement software","Stacks with no tool-using agents","Anyone wanting an off switch they never have to configure"],"flags":["policy_not_enforcement_software","requires_own_agent_stack"],"ask":["Can my agent framework actually honor an allow/deny matrix I define?"]},"agent-memory-governance-kit":{"kind":"governance kit (classification model, retention schedules, scorecard)","fit":["Teams running agents with persistent memory","Operators who need a defensible written memory policy","Reviewer agents auditing memory stores"],"not":["Buyers expecting software that deletes memories automatically","Agents with no persistence layer","Anyone seeking legal compliance certification"],"flags":["policy_not_enforcement_software","not_legal_advice"],"ask":["Does my agent actually persist memory that needs governing?"]},"agent-error-recovery-playbook":{"kind":"playbook (failure taxonomy, recovery ladders, escalation rules)","fit":["Operators of multi-step or unattended agents","Engineers formalizing retry/escalation behavior","Orchestrators that follow written recovery ladders"],"not":["Buyers expecting automatic self-healing software","Single-prompt casual use","Teams unwilling to wire escalation to a human"],"flags":["playbook_not_monitoring_software","requires_own_agent_stack"],"ask":["Where in my stack would written recovery ladders actually get applied?"]},"agentic-workflow-compiler":{"kind":"method kit (workflow spec schema, compilation passes, validation checklists)","fit":["Operations leads specifying workflows for agents","Agent builders who need unambiguous specs","Teams translating SOPs into agent tasks"],"not":["Buyers expecting a software compiler that emits running code","Teams with no workflows to formalize","Anyone expecting drag-and-drop automation building"],"flags":["name_implies_software","method_not_executable"],"ask":["Am I ready to write specs by hand using a rigorous method, rather than generate them with a tool?"]},"prompt-harness-builder-kit":{"kind":"template + prompt-engineering kit (10 finished harnesses, templates, gates, rubrics)","fit":["Anyone whose AI output quality is inconsistent","Operators letting agents run prompts semi-unattended with QA","Claude/ChatGPT power users who reuse prompts"],"not":["Buyers wanting one-click prompt magic with zero structure","Users unwilling to define inputs and pass/fail criteria","Teams expecting built Zapier automations (blueprints are descriptions only)"],"flags":["blueprints_not_built_automations"],"ask":["Am I willing to define required inputs and a pass/fail gate for my important prompts?"]},"ai-agent-permission-safety-gate-kit":{"kind":"safety kit (permission tiers, approval checkpoints, rollback playbooks)","fit":["Operators running agents with real-world access","Small agencies deploying agents for clients","Anyone formalizing when an agent must stop and ask"],"not":["Buyers expecting sandboxing or enforcement software","Pure-chat users whose AI never acts on anything","Anyone treating written gates as a substitute for platform security"],"flags":["policy_not_enforcement_software"],"ask":["Will I actually configure my agents to honor written approval checkpoints?"]},"ai-output-quality-control-scorecard-system":{"kind":"scorecard system (rubrics, gates, review SOPs)","fit":["Agencies and teams reviewing AI deliverables","Operators adding a QA step before anything ships","Agents running self-review against anchored rubrics"],"not":["Buyers expecting automated grading software","Anyone unwilling to define what 'good' means for their work","Teams looking for a hosted review dashboard"],"flags":["name_implies_software","scoring_requires_your_ai_or_you"],"ask":["Do I produce enough AI output that a written QA gate would pay for itself?"]},"digital-product-factory-os":{"kind":"document operating system (stage-gated pipeline: validate/spec/build/QA/launch/iterate)","fit":["Digital creators shipping products with AI help","Solo builders who need a kill/proceed discipline","Agencies productizing services"],"not":["Buyers expecting products to be generated for them","Anyone seeking income promises - none are made","People who will not kill weak ideas at the gates"],"flags":["name_implies_software","outcome_depends_on_buyer_execution"],"ask":["Am I prepared to validate and possibly kill my idea at stage gates before building?"]},"marketplace-listing-conversion-kit":{"kind":"template kit (listing structures, title/description harnesses, QA scorecard)","fit":["Digital product and template sellers","Small e-commerce operators improving listings","Agents drafting listings for human review"],"not":["Buyers expecting ranking or sales promises - none are made","Anyone expecting marketplace API integrations or auto-posting","Physical-retail-only sellers (examples skew digital)"],"flags":["outcome_depends_on_buyer_execution","no_platform_integration"],"ask":["Do I have live or planned listings I can rewrite with these templates this week?"]},"creator-content-factory-ai-agent-os":{"kind":"document operating system (content pipeline SOPs, harnesses, repurposing matrix)","fit":["Content creators and newsletter writers using AI","Solo brands formalizing a weekly cadence","Agents drafting content inside a defined pipeline"],"not":["Buyers expecting audience-growth promises - none are made","Anyone expecting auto-posting or scheduler integrations","Creators who want fully hands-off content"],"flags":["name_implies_software","outcome_depends_on_buyer_execution","no_platform_integration"],"ask":["Will I commit to a weekly cadence the planner can structure?"]},"local-business-ai-marketing-os":{"kind":"document operating system (weekly cadence SOPs, harnesses, response templates)","fit":["Local service business owners doing their own marketing with AI","Solo operators and small agencies serving local clients","Beginners - this is the most beginner-friendly kit"],"not":["Buyers expecting customer or revenue promises - none are made","Anyone expecting ad-platform integrations or auto-posting","Businesses unwilling to post consistently"],"flags":["name_implies_software","outcome_depends_on_buyer_execution","no_platform_integration"],"ask":["Can I commit roughly 2 hours a week to run the cadence?"]},"agent-evaluation-harness-suite":{"kind":"evaluation kit (task suites, graders, regression gates, run records)","fit":["Engineers and QA leads evaluating agent quality","Teams gating releases on written regression checks","Evaluator agents applying anchored rubrics"],"not":["Buyers expecting an eval runner or benchmark software","Teams with no agent to evaluate","Anyone expecting hosted dashboards or leaderboards"],"flags":["name_implies_software","requires_own_agent_stack"],"ask":["Do I have an agent and the time to actually run structured evals against it?"]},"agent-prompt-injection-defense-kit":{"kind":"defensive security kit (trust taxonomy, quarantine policies, detection heuristics, regression suites)","fit":["Engineers hardening agents that read untrusted content","Security reviewers writing agent trust policy","Operators adding written injection defenses and tests"],"not":["Buyers expecting a security product that blocks attacks automatically","Anyone wanting a security guarantee - none exists, from anyone","Offensive security use (defensive only)"],"flags":["no_security_guarantee","policy_not_enforcement_software"],"ask":["Do my agents process untrusted content (web, email, files) where written defenses and regression tests would apply?"]},"agent-audit-trail-generator":{"kind":"schema + method kit (action taxonomy, entry schemas, integrity and redaction rules)","fit":["Operators who must show what their agents did","Compliance leads defining audit requirements","Reviewer agents writing entries against a fixed schema"],"not":["Buyers expecting logging software or a dashboard - 'Generator' names the schema system, not a tool","Teams that will not wire logging into their stack","Anyone needing certified compliance tooling"],"flags":["name_implies_software","requires_own_agent_stack","not_legal_advice"],"ask":["Can my agent framework emit structured log entries I define?"]},"agent-safety-case-builder":{"kind":"governance kit (claim-argument-evidence safety cases, evidence registry, review records)","fit":["Safety leads and engineering managers justifying agent deployments","Teams that need a reviewable written safety argument","Compliance reviewer agents checking evidence links"],"not":["Buyers expecting automated safety verification","Casual single-agent hobby use","Anyone treating a safety case as a legal shield by itself"],"flags":["method_not_executable","not_legal_advice"],"ask":["Do I have a deployment decision that genuinely needs a written safety argument?"]},"agent-runtime-incident-response-kit":{"kind":"operations kit (incident classes, containment ladders, kill-switch procedures, postmortems)","fit":["Operators and on-call engineers running agents in production","Teams rehearsing containment before they need it","Supervisor agents following written containment ladders"],"not":["Buyers expecting monitoring/alerting software or an emergency service","Stacks with no runtime agents","Anyone expecting the kit to stop incidents by itself"],"flags":["playbook_not_monitoring_software","requires_own_agent_stack"],"ask":["Does my platform expose stop/disable controls these procedures can point at?"]},"agent-skill-packaging-kit":{"kind":"packaging kit (manifest standards, trigger specs, test packs, checklists)","fit":["Developers packaging skills for agent platforms","Teams standardizing skill quality before distribution","Builder agents assembling skill packages against a standard"],"not":["Buyers expecting a packaging CLI or build tool","Anyone expecting marketplace submission or approval - none is promised","Non-builders with no skills to package"],"flags":["method_not_executable","no_marketplace_approval_promise"],"ask":["Am I building skills for a platform where a written packaging standard raises quality?"]},"mcp-server-description-optimizer":{"kind":"method kit (description contract, quality rubric, failure catalog, rewrite harness)","fit":["MCP server developers whose tools get mis-selected","Agent platform teams maintaining tool surfaces","Dev agents applying the contract to description rewrites"],"not":["Buyers expecting a linter or code tool - 'Optimizer' names the method","Anyone without MCP servers or tool descriptions to improve","Teams expecting model behavior guarantees"],"flags":["name_implies_software","outcome_depends_on_model_behavior"],"ask":["Do I own MCP tool descriptions I can rewrite and re-test this week?"]},"gpt-assistant-productization-kit":{"kind":"productization kit (pipeline with exit gates, charter standard, config specs, guardrail checks)","fit":["Assistant builders shipping GPTs/assistants to real users","Agencies delivering client assistants against a checklist","Review agents checking configs against the standard"],"not":["Buyers expecting store approval or distribution promises","Anyone expecting the kit to build the assistant for them","Teams without an assistant concept to productize"],"flags":["no_marketplace_approval_promise","outcome_depends_on_buyer_execution"],"ask":["Do I have an assistant concept ready to take through exit gates?"]},"agent-marketplace-listing-kit":{"kind":"listing standard kit (dual-reader listing schema, claim-evidence maps, worked listings)","fit":["Sellers preparing products for agent-mediated buying","Marketplace operators defining listing standards","Seller agents generating listings against the schema"],"not":["Buyers expecting live marketplace integrations or traffic","Anyone expecting sales promises - none are made","Sellers with nothing to list"],"flags":["outcome_depends_on_buyer_execution","no_platform_integration"],"ask":["Do I sell (or plan to sell) products that agents will evaluate on a buyer's behalf?"]},"agent-license-access-control-kit":{"kind":"rights kit (license record schema, entitlement rules, verification checks)","fit":["Digital sellers defining machine-readable license records","Multi-agent operators verifying entitlements in writing","Consuming agents checking license records against rules"],"not":["Buyers expecting DRM, license servers, or copy protection software","Anyone expecting legal enforcement services","Sellers without products to license"],"flags":["policy_not_enforcement_software","not_legal_advice"],"ask":["Do I need machine-readable license records, as opposed to technical copy protection?"]},"agent-commerce-trust-layer":{"kind":"trust framework kit (verification checklists, claim-evidence, dispute records, reputation schemas)","fit":["Marketplace operators designing trust rails","Buying/seller agents applying written verification standards","Agent-commerce builders needing a trust vocabulary"],"not":["Buyers expecting a live reputation network or escrow service","Anyone expecting fraud prevention software","Casual sellers without agent-commerce ambitions"],"flags":["name_implies_software","adoption_dependent"],"ask":["Am I building or governing agent commerce where a written trust standard gets adopted?"]},"multi-agent-role-charter-kit":{"kind":"coordination kit (role-authority contracts, authority maps, escalation matrices)","fit":["Operators running two or more coordinating agents","Orchestrator builders defining who may decide what","Agent-organization designers"],"not":["Single-agent or single-chat users","Buyers expecting an orchestration framework or runtime","Anyone expecting agents to self-organize from the documents alone"],"flags":["requires_own_agent_stack","method_not_executable"],"ask":["Do I actually run multiple agents whose authority needs defining?"]},"agent-handoff-protocol-kit":{"kind":"coordination kit (handoff envelopes, acceptance tests, worked handoffs)","fit":["Multi-agent operators with real handoffs","Human-in-the-loop teams formalizing acceptance","Sending/receiving agents applying envelope structure"],"not":["Single-agent workflows with nothing to hand off","Buyers expecting a message bus or queue software","Teams unwilling to define acceptance criteria"],"flags":["requires_own_agent_stack","method_not_executable"],"ask":["Where in my workflow does work change hands today?"]},"agent-deployment-readiness-checklist-system":{"kind":"checklist system (evidence-gated readiness gates, sign-off records)","fit":["Engineering managers gating agent launches","Reviewer agents verifying evidence completeness","Teams that want auditable go/no-go decisions"],"not":["Buyers expecting automated testing or CI tooling","Hobby deployments where a checklist feels heavier than the stakes","Anyone signing off without gathering the evidence"],"flags":["name_implies_software","method_not_executable"],"ask":["Do I have deployments where an evidence-backed go/no-go would change decisions?"]},"agent-procurement-policy-pack":{"kind":"policy pack (procurement contracts, budget rules, vendor rubrics, purchase records)","fit":["Operators delegating vendor evaluation to agents","Finance leads bounding agent spending authority in writing","Procurement agents applying documented rubrics"],"not":["Buyers expecting agents to safely buy things today - autonomous purchasing is not enabled by this pack or this store","Anyone expecting payment integrations","Teams with no delegated evaluation or buying"],"flags":["policy_not_enforcement_software","no_payment_integration"],"ask":["Am I bounding agent recommendations/evaluations, understanding no purchasing rail is included?"]}}}